vicradlehead:

this post is the only one that has 12 million notes and it changes all the time. the flubber robin williams, the rogerina, the “reblog if you dont have a tumblr” and the dean winchester gym shorts is literally all the same post and you guys are astonished that it has so many notes every time a new version of it comes around

mr-cappadocia:

theanticlimactic:

mr-cappadocia:

0hanameansfam:

mr-cappadocia:

0hanameansfam:

In no way does this want to make me reconsider. I’m sorry (actually I’m not) but if I get raped and get pregnant, I am NOT having that child. It would be unfair to them. I wouldn’t love it as I should. Not to mention the physical and mental anguish I would go through while being pregnant. It is my decision, not yours to make for me

Anyone else see the irony in this poster being named “0hanameansfam”?
I mean does no one see this?

Just cause I value family doesn’t mean that I would have a child of rape

It’s good to meet people that value family*.

Saying someone who is pro choice doesn’t value family is like saying you don’t love animals if you aren’t a vegan. It’s fucking retarded. Grow up, bro.

This isn’t a question of “pro choice” this is purely and exclusively about whether or not “child of rape” is a special category of person that deserves to die.
If you would otherwise not have an abortion why would be child being the product of someone else’s bad actions elevate them to that status?
If you met Frank at a party, fucked and got pregnant and wouldn’t get an abortion under those circumstances… but met Frank at a party, got raped and got pregnant and would get an abortion under those circumstances.
There’s a massive disconnect between the two. If you would risk giving birth to the first child but not the second you’re saying in no uncertain terms that the child themselves should bear the burden of the bad acts of the father. That being the child of rape means you do not deserve the same shot at life that the child of consensual sex does.
I think that’s bullshit. It’s certainly not conducive to the belief that family comes first.

I’m pro-choice and this doesn’t make me feel any different and I’ve had plenty of arguments with people about it. On top of what’s been said the child will retain certain traits from BOTH parents and if one of them is a rapist there is a possibility the child will too become a rapist at some point in life. Not taking that risk and not destroying my own life because of a pregnancy via rape isn’t a horrible thing, it’s called looking out for yourself and ensuring that when you want a child that you are PREPARED and it’s something you want and can handle. Yes, adoption is an option but do you know how many children are in the system to be adopted? That’s a fucked up life no child should live. Not to mentioned trying to explain who the child’s father is and how the two of you “met”. AwkwaarrrrrrdSorry if you’re pro-life and you don’t agree. My opinion won’t change.

mr-cappadocia:

theanticlimactic:

mr-cappadocia:

0hanameansfam:

mr-cappadocia:

0hanameansfam:

In no way does this want to make me reconsider. I’m sorry (actually I’m not) but if I get raped and get pregnant, I am NOT having that child. It would be unfair to them. I wouldn’t love it as I should. Not to mention the physical and mental anguish I would go through while being pregnant. It is my decision, not yours to make for me

Anyone else see the irony in this poster being named “0hanameansfam”?

I mean does no one see this?

Just cause I value family doesn’t mean that I would have a child of rape

It’s good to meet people that value family*.

Saying someone who is pro choice doesn’t value family is like saying you don’t love animals if you aren’t a vegan. It’s fucking retarded. Grow up, bro.

This isn’t a question of “pro choice” this is purely and exclusively about whether or not “child of rape” is a special category of person that deserves to die.

If you would otherwise not have an abortion why would be child being the product of someone else’s bad actions elevate them to that status?

If you met Frank at a party, fucked and got pregnant and wouldn’t get an abortion under those circumstances… but met Frank at a party, got raped and got pregnant and would get an abortion under those circumstances.

There’s a massive disconnect between the two. If you would risk giving birth to the first child but not the second you’re saying in no uncertain terms that the child themselves should bear the burden of the bad acts of the father. That being the child of rape means you do not deserve the same shot at life that the child of consensual sex does.

I think that’s bullshit. It’s certainly not conducive to the belief that family comes first.

I’m pro-choice and this doesn’t make me feel any different and I’ve had plenty of arguments with people about it. On top of what’s been said the child will retain certain traits from BOTH parents and if one of them is a rapist there is a possibility the child will too become a rapist at some point in life. Not taking that risk and not destroying my own life because of a pregnancy via rape isn’t a horrible thing, it’s called looking out for yourself and ensuring that when you want a child that you are PREPARED and it’s something you want and can handle. Yes, adoption is an option but do you know how many children are in the system to be adopted? That’s a fucked up life no child should live.

Not to mentioned trying to explain who the child’s father is and how the two of you “met”. Awkwaarrrrrrd

Sorry if you’re pro-life and you don’t agree. My opinion won’t change.

thefriendlywitch:

Herbs herbs herbs! For all your reference, spell making and craft needs.

shisnojon:

how come threesome porn always start off the same like

image

Sailor Moon Crystal

silvermoon424:

Although this often comes as a surprise to people who haven’t read the manga, Sailor Venus is technically the leader of the Inner Senshi, not Sailor Moon. And Sailor Mars is her second-in-command (a concept that’s heavily expanded on in PGSM and, to a lesser extent, the anime). Venus’ leadership…

deaddreamers:

best photoset I’ve ever seen

WHEN MY FRIEND GETS SLOPPY DRUNK AND I HAVE TO DELIVER HER TO HER BOYFRIEND
keyofnik:

moonwhing:

So now we know Minako is the one taking the Sailor Moon product photos. [x]


oh my god

WOW!!!

keyofnik:

moonwhing:

So now we know Minako is the one taking the Sailor Moon product photos. [x]

image

oh my god

WOW!!!

codenamesailorb:

NEW OFFICIAL SAILOR MOON CRYSTAL IMAGES from the official Sailor Moon twitter! I think they’re from the BR/DVD release?!
Follow me on twitter for constant Sailor Moon updates @ CodenameSailorB

!!!!!!!!!!

codenamesailorb:

NEW OFFICIAL SAILOR MOON CRYSTAL IMAGES from the official Sailor Moon twitter! I think they’re from the BR/DVD release?!

Follow me on twitter for constant Sailor Moon updates @ CodenameSailorB

!!!!!!!!!!

polararts:

drtanner:

chakrabot:

slitheringink:

artofcarmen:

fyeahwhovians:

raygender:

themediafix:

Breaking news: The D.C. Appeals Court just killed Net Neutrality.This could be the end of the Internet as we know it. But it doesn’t have to be. Tell the FCC to restore Net Neutrality: http://bit.ly/1iOOjoe

they want to make the internet like tv. with channels and paying to get to specific websites and things. net neutrality = not doing that

This impacts every internet user. Please signal boost the hell out of this and sign the petition if you are American

I do not reblog things like this very often, but this affects me both personally and my business as a freelance artist.
In the economy here; cash is already strapped as it is. You bet your ass companies would suck the ever living life out of misc. art sites.
I don’t want it to ever come down to me choosing between groceries or purchasing a new tier package via comcast to be able to access tumblr or DeviantArt (let alone not guaranteeing I’ll even be seen by my customer base since they may not want to pay out their asses either). It doesn’t seem important to most, but I do 90% of my business online entirely.
Please sign up, fight for this and share it with your followers/friends/family and urge them to give them hell as well.

Not writing related, but this is incredibly important. While we pay for service via ISPs, the internet has been a relatively free space where everyone, no matter their income level, is able to connect, access a wealth of information, and express themselves. The Internet has become a major part of our culture as human beings and the notion that ISPs might be able to limit what sites I can access unless I pay them more is utterly sickening. A lot of us are cash strapped as is, and I’d rather not be limited even more by someone else’s greed. Net Neutrality is essential and I hope you guys will understand why it needs to remain.
-Morgan
P.S. Signal boost this if you’re able.

“ limit what sites I can access unless I pay them more”
 limit what sites I can access unless I pay them more
 limit what sites I can access unless I pay them more
 limit what sites I can access unless I pay them more
 limit what sites I can access unless I pay them more
DO YOU WANT THIS? NO?? CLICK THE LINK. REBLOG.

As I understand this ruling, it means that businesses now have to pay extra to ISPs to have access to their websites through that ISP provided at a reasonable speed. If you don’t pay, users’ access to your website will be slowed to a crawl - so independent people and small businesses can forget about getting onto that high speed access tier. 
This means that the American internet is going to be firmly under the control of those who have the most money. You’ll only get to see the content of those who can pay the ISPs to provide access at a reasonable speed. This means that you can expect to see skewed representation of just about everything, with those bigger businesses who can afford to pay ISPs a premium for access deciding what you can and cannot read, view and consume on the internet.
This is not something that we have in the UK. Our ISPs compete with each other to provide higher speeds, better services and lower prices, but because there’s a monopoly in the US of a few ISPs who provide services, they can afford to do this to you. You can’t go anywhere else, after all.
Everyone in the US needs to sign that petition, call their representatives, write angry letters and do whatever you can to tell your government that this ruling is Not Okay.

Maybe you guys are sick of this post but It’s really important to freelance artists and pretty much everyone who uses the internet, so here it is again.  \o0o/

polararts:

drtanner:

chakrabot:

slitheringink:

artofcarmen:

fyeahwhovians:

raygender:

themediafix:

Breaking news: The D.C. Appeals Court just killed Net Neutrality.

This could be the end of the Internet as we know it. But it doesn’t have to be. 

Tell the FCC to restore Net Neutrality: http://bit.ly/1iOOjoe

they want to make the internet like tv. with channels and paying to get to specific websites and things. net neutrality = not doing that

This impacts every internet user. Please signal boost the hell out of this and sign the petition if you are American

I do not reblog things like this very often, but this affects me both personally and my business as a freelance artist.

In the economy here; cash is already strapped as it is. You bet your ass companies would suck the ever living life out of misc. art sites.

I don’t want it to ever come down to me choosing between groceries or purchasing a new tier package via comcast to be able to access tumblr or DeviantArt (let alone not guaranteeing I’ll even be seen by my customer base since they may not want to pay out their asses either). It doesn’t seem important to most, but I do 90% of my business online entirely.

Please sign up, fight for this and share it with your followers/friends/family and urge them to give them hell as well.

Not writing related, but this is incredibly important. While we pay for service via ISPs, the internet has been a relatively free space where everyone, no matter their income level, is able to connect, access a wealth of information, and express themselves. The Internet has become a major part of our culture as human beings and the notion that ISPs might be able to limit what sites I can access unless I pay them more is utterly sickening. A lot of us are cash strapped as is, and I’d rather not be limited even more by someone else’s greed. Net Neutrality is essential and I hope you guys will understand why it needs to remain.

-Morgan

P.S. Signal boost this if you’re able.

“ limit what sites I can access unless I pay them more”

 limit what sites I can access unless I pay them more

 limit what sites I can access unless I pay them more

 limit what sites I can access unless I pay them more

 limit what sites I can access unless I pay them more

DO YOU WANT THIS? NO?? CLICK THE LINK. REBLOG.

As I understand this ruling, it means that businesses now have to pay extra to ISPs to have access to their websites through that ISP provided at a reasonable speed. If you don’t pay, users’ access to your website will be slowed to a crawl - so independent people and small businesses can forget about getting onto that high speed access tier. 

This means that the American internet is going to be firmly under the control of those who have the most money. You’ll only get to see the content of those who can pay the ISPs to provide access at a reasonable speed. This means that you can expect to see skewed representation of just about everything, with those bigger businesses who can afford to pay ISPs a premium for access deciding what you can and cannot read, view and consume on the internet.

This is not something that we have in the UK. Our ISPs compete with each other to provide higher speeds, better services and lower prices, but because there’s a monopoly in the US of a few ISPs who provide services, they can afford to do this to you. You can’t go anywhere else, after all.

Everyone in the US needs to sign that petition, call their representatives, write angry letters and do whatever you can to tell your government that this ruling is Not Okay.

Maybe you guys are sick of this post but It’s really important to freelance artists and pretty much everyone who uses the internet, so here it is again.  \o0o/

attackonsociallife:

quibbs:

tyleroakley:

outlawsoflove:

My class pretended to play dead.

Just as the Mayans predicted, the apocalypse came with the signal of a cough.

these middle schoolers read better than my high school honors english class

I REALLY HAVE TO REBLOG THIS IM SORRY THE FUCKING TEACHER

This is the best!